"Globalization
is much like fire. Fire itself is neither good nor bad. Used properly,
it can cook food, sterilize equipment, form iron, and heat our
homes. Used carelessly, fire can destroy lives, towns and forests
in an instant." Keith
Porter, in his article Globalization: Good or Bad
Over the past
decade, the term 'globalization' has become a hot-button issue.
There are those that believe that the global market encourages
efficiency through competition and division of labor-allowing
a specialization that enables people and businesses to focus on
what they do best. That the global marketplace offers the opportunity
to tap into more and larger markets around the world, and creates
hundreds of millions of jobs; many critically needed in developing
countries, lifting millions out of poverty.
There are those that want to isolate America by erecting trade
and investment barriers. Those that object to outsourcing, believing
that it takes away American jobs, especially from the unskilled
worker, and weakens the American economy. Some believe that globalization
will spoil cultural diversity and the ways of indigenous people,
leading to a world homogenization.
The majority
of people stand somewhere in the middle. Most often, objectors
are not against free trade or globlaization per se, but are more
cautious about the stability, transparency and predictability
which business needs to operate at global level. Anti-trust laws,
the Securities and Exchange Commission, labor unions, the Federal
Trade Commission, OSHA, etc. keep American commerce in check.
There is no equivalent for these agencies in the global marketplace.
Many objectors simply believe that a balance must be found between
rules and freedom if the global economy is to realize its full
potential. That rules must be set by an international organization,
such as the World Trade Organization or the like.
"Globalization
is not a phenomenon. It is not just some passing trend. Today
it is an overarching international system shaping the domestic
politics and foreign relations of virtually every country, and
we need to understand it as such." Thomas Friedman, in his
book The Lexus and the Olive Tree
The
big winners of globalization are the consumers. Global competition
increases product quality, widens the range of available goods
and services, and keeps prices low. Globalization allows people
to be more connected than ever; to enjoy ethnic foods, relatively
inexpensive foreign travel, and low-cost products. Inexpensive,
fast, and reliable communication and transportation options enable
producers of goods and services in low-wage countries to challenge
high-cost producers in rich countries on their home turf. Globalization
rewards firms that are innovative and competitive, whether they
be small businesses or multi-million dollar operations. In a global
economy, there is a niche for everyone.
This is a
critical moment for U.S. commerce. Yes there is some risk, but
there are also rich possibilities. Take Caterpillar, Inc. Caterpillar
is a company that has thrived in this age of globalism because,
rather than protecting themselves against it, they have embraced
it. Caterpillar is one of America's major manufacturers, exporting
more than $9 billion in products. But they have also become a
major British manufacturer, a major Brazilian manufacturer, and
a major Chinese manufacturer, to name three of the 40 countries
where they have established a presence. By expanding globally,
they have maintained their ability to grow, refusing to concede
markets to competitors. When it made sense to invest for local
access, they did, and found that their U.S. exports to these countries
increased as well. In fact, in the past several years, Caterpillar
has more than doubled their Chinese workforce, and significantly
expanded their sales there. At the same time, they increased their
U.S. exports to China by 40%--creating 5,000 new production jobs
here in the U.S.
Caterpillar's
global presence also gives them a natural hedge position. History
shows that the world's major currencies-the dollar, euro, yen-can
fluctuate anywhere from 15-40% against one another in a two-year
period. Having a presence in each currency zone protects them
from this instability.

American manufacturers
must stay aggressive with product development programs-and ensure
that the goods they manufacture are desired all over the world.
To keep costs low and productivity high, they must embrace lean
manufacturing principles-- increasing the use of robotics and
automation, and focusing on just-in-time delivery. They must invest
in their people-providing the education and workforce training
they need to succeed. Our international competitors are working
to produce better products and adopting world-class processes,
but they cannot replicate our market size and proximity. The ideas
and competitive spirit that American employees bring to the table
must be nurtured.
Finally, and probably most important, U.S. manufacturers must
believe that they can compete on the world stage. They must look
at globalization and international competition as an opportunity
to make themselves stronger and more efficient. What's good for
the world is good for the U.S. Look at it this way: The U.S. comprises
only 5% of the world's population. This means that 95% of potential
customers are located abroad. Trade liberalization brings more
and more of these people into the global economy. As their quality
of life improves, they become potential consumers of the products
that U.S. manufacturers provide.
The next generation-today's
students-must be ready to compete on a global level. Butler
Technology and Career Development Schools (Located in Hamilton,
Ohio) has developed a Global Business and Marketing Student Education
Program that takes up to 25 students on an 18-day trip to China
to experience Chinese culture and life as a Chinese student.
"China
has the fastest growing economy in the world, and will be a major
player in the world's economic and social future," says Bob
Sommers, Butler Tech CEO. "Today's students need to understand
that, in the future, they can either be competitors or partners
with the Chinese. American schools aren't focused on the right
things to keep our students competitive in the future. Chinese
students go to school almost year round, learning technological
skills and languages to prepare them for globalization. American
students will need to understand the Chinese culture."
"Science
and technology are driving today's innovation. Forty to seventy
percent of the world economy is digital-using not cash, but credit
cards and digital transactions. Meaning that, as long as you have
a broadband connection, you can work anywhere in the world. The
old-boy system of having the right connections is rapidly disappearing.
Outsourcing works because there are a lot of people out there
willing to do a lot more for a lot less money," Sommers continues.
Education
is mandatory for Chinese students, free until the eighth grade.
Students pay for high school education, usually living far away
from their families in dorms housing up to 9,000 students. Chinese
high schools resemble our college campuses--higher education being
only for those students who have passed rigorous entrance examinations.
Shanghai is one of the most developed areas in China in terms
of education, with 215 technical schools educating almost 247,000
students. Asian students face crushing workloads and are very
disciplined. The education system is rooted in standardized tests,
which are the single most important factor in deciding one's general
career path.
Chinese students achieve near-perfect scores on Western standardized
tests. However, when they come to America, they often find themselves
ill-prepared for Western education. Chinese students are taught
that all questions have only one correct answer, and have a shocking
capacity for memorization. This lack of creativity in China's
education system will prove to be a major stumbling block in student
development. Chinese government and business leaders worry about
a manufacturing-based economy, which is unable to create new technology,
lacks major research and development projects - and lags far behind
in creative sectors like marketing and design. For China to become
a true player on the world stage, and move beyond being the world's
factory, it must instill a creative thinking that cannot be taught
through rote learning and memorization.
As for American students, there is little debate that our math
scores rank well below those of most Asian countries, and that
we are falling behind in sciences and engineering. Many believe,
that to compete on the world stage, U.S. education must move away
from an emphasis on flexibility and individual learning styles
toward a more strict, disciplined teaching environment emphasizing
math and science.
"By the time Chinese students are 18 years old, they have
the technology and language skills our students don't have until
they're at least 22-23 years old. That's 4-5 years of more productivity.
Our kids need a more technological education. They need to develop
skills they'll need to compete in life," Sommers explains.
America can compete and win on the world stage if we embrace globalization
as an inevitable force, focus on enhancing its positive aspects
and diminish the negative. Adopt traits of other cultures that
will make ours even stronger. Learn what works for other countries
and economies and find ways to apply them to our own. Teach other
countries practices that have made our country so great. Above
all, approach it with the spirit of optimism and fierce competitiveness
that has made America succeed for all these years. It's a win-win-win.
Robin Lynd is Public Relations Associate for
Edoc Marketing, Inc. She can be contacted at:
Robin@edocmarketing.com